Postmodernism and the commodification of art :: essays research papers

Postmodern Methodology is Hypocrisy  â â â â â€Å"What is striking is exactly the level of accord in postmodernist talk that there is not, at this point any chance of agreement, the definitive declarations of the vanishing of conclusive position and the advancement and distribution of an aggregate and extensive account of a social condition wherein totality in no longer thinkable.† So there is an agreement that there is no accord, a power saying there is no last power and a totalizing story that totality does not exist anymore. These three thoughts could persuade that postmodernism is lip service. As it were, it must be double-dealing. In the event that a meaning of postmodernism is the disintegration of the six mainstays of advancement however those six columns despite everything exist paying little mind to postmodernism that how does postmodernism exist? Postmodernism appears to have two totally separate lines of reasoning. The principal line of reasoning is the possibility of paralogy and upsetting the authority . Th e second line of reasoning is the possibility of commodification. The two appear to have nothing to do with one another. On one hand, one could feel that postmodernism is something to be thankful for on the grounds that it liberates people’s points of view. Postmodernism is the annihilation of authority, opening up majority, assorted variety, and heterogeneity. Then again, it commodifies culture and feeds into capitalism†¦though back over in the direct it is by all accounts against free enterprise since private enterprise is authority. For what reason does postmodern idea attempt to disturb the advanced industrialist authority that it is additionally taking care of into? Postmodernists can profess to contend against everything present day, yet where does that really get them? They utilize the case that there are no examples or prime examples as a worldview for postmodernism, in this way nullifying the point. Postmodernism is by all accounts a push for Lyotard’s thought of paralogy. We’ll characterize paralogy as â€Å"faulty or intentionally opposing thinking, intended to move and change the structures of reason itself.† It appears that postmodernists are factious to innovators in order to change reality and force structures, yet seem to make another similarly as static reality and force structure in their places. This new reality becomes authority, gets present day. So do postmodernists need to develop to remain in front of the ever-changing innovation that they help make? Is the reason for postmodernism just to connect with innovation in a force battle? This is, obviously, just my own theory. Culture is Commodified After a laborious examination of the perusing, class notes and conversations, the creator of this paper has thought of the accompanying rundown: All the powers of media and social creation are interrelated.